Webinar on The Marriage of the PFMEA and Control Plan, A Dynamic Control Plan

Overview: 

Come celebrate the union of the PFMEA and the CP! See how the Dynamic Control Plan (DCP) combines both tools into ONE enabling the savings of hundreds of hours of Engineering time, reducing the risk of documentation errors, and, actually improving QMS effectiveness while reducing repetitious work. This session will show you how you can benefit from the DCP!

 

• Process Failure Modes Effects Analysis (FMEA): High level overview of PFMEA column content. Not designed to be an in-depth session of each PFMEA column
• Control Plan (CP): High level overview of CP column content. Not designed to be an in-depth session of each PFMEA column
• Dynamic Control Plan (DCP): Step by step blend of the two documents per general AIAG standards; no column will contextually be left behind. Participants will actually observe the completion of 2-3 lines of a DCP for a modeled item including both a variable and an attribute feature
• Benefits Review: Pros/cons of the DCP format will be reviewed including:
• Pros: Some positives include improved risk analysis, reduced overall time in document management, reduced duplication of data collection, reduced risk of document alignment, Improved utilization in CA/PA analysis, etc
• Cons: Some cons that need to be managed include transitioning the "silos" of engineering and quality teams into one effective group and managing customer expectations of independent formats, etc.

Why should you Attend: 

The Dynamic Control Plan (DCP) purely eliminates the stand-alone Control Plan as part of the Advanced Planning and Quality (APQP) Documentation process by combining the Process Failure Modes and Effects Analysis (PFMEA) and Control Plan (CP) into one handy format. 

By essentially "bolting on" a few columns to the PFMEA, the CP is now powerfully enabled to effectively prevent and/or detect the failure modes that it is originally designed to manage. It forces the "completion of a linear thought" as practitioners manage every line item of the PFMEA and strongly improves the efficacy of this risk-analysis process. This little-used but Automotive Industry Action Group (AIAG) approved format reduces hundreds of hours of engineering/quality time in document preparation and largely mitigates disconnects in the 8D Corrective Action/Preventive Action (CA/PA) analysis process.

A live sample will be demonstrated step by step across the process. This engaging session will leave people motivated and with a plan of how to simultaneously reduce complexity while improving upon the efficiency and effectiveness of their quality management system.

This session enables participants to learn how to develop, create, execute and interpret an Attribute Agreement Analysis (AAA) so that an accurate and repeatable disposition can be made and rework and returns can be effectively reduced. An AAA is an "MSA for attributes." Auditing professionals need to understand the effectiveness of these methods when used by their clientele and/or in their own organization. Attendees will see how they can apply this tool while learning how to mitigate business cost exposure. 

Areas Covered in the Session:

• To help practitioners understand how the DCP can be positively leveraged to Reduce business complexity
• Increase effectively of both tools and better predict risk.
• Mitigate system cross-referencing errors.

Who Will Benefit:

• Quality
• Engineering
• Lean and Audit system practitioners
• Auditors, Engineers, Analysts, Managers, Directors

Speaker Profile:

Jd Marhevko has served as Vice President of Quality and Lean for Accuride Corporation since April 2012, having joined the company as Vice President, Quality in January 2012. She has been involved in Operations and Quality/Lean/Six Sigma efforts across a variety of industries for more than 25 years. Extensively experienced in developing cost-effective and value-added quality and lean systems enterprise-wide, Marhevko has an impressive track record of success in aligning goals to drive process improvement and productivity. 

Marhevko came to Accuride Corp. from Global Productivity Solutions and JQLC, Inc., where she served as Business Excellence Consultant. She previously held quality, performance and operations positions at SPX Test & Measurement, Eaton Global-Hose Division, Cincinnati Milacron, Cherry Automotive, and Robert Bosch Corporation. Marhevko is an American Society of Quality (ASQ) Fellow, ASQ Certified Six Sigma Black Belt (CSSBB), ASQ Certified Quality Engineer (CQE), ASQ Certified Manager of Quality/Organizational Excellence (CMQ/OE), an ASQ Certified Trainer for a variety of Quality Tools including Hoshin Kanri and Strategic Planning. She is the Immediate Past-Chair of the ASQ Quality Management Division (QMD) which has more than 23,000 global members.